Connect with us

Fintech

Why Software Platforms Still Struggle to Turn Payments Into Profits | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Software platforms run the world. Healthcare, logistics, travel, insurance — every industry now relies on software to streamline operations and deliver value.

However, as macroeconomic pressures mount, embedding payments into those platforms has moved from a differentiator to a requirement.

That’s not the same as doing it well.

“Many software platforms have embedded payments to some degree into their experiences,” PYMNTS CEO Karen Webster said during a Summer School discussion with Jay Dearborn, president of Corporate Payments at WEX. “But how do they know whether they’ve done it well enough to move the needle for their business?”

Although embedded payments are everywhere, real results are not. Most software companies confuse technical integration with business transformation. They mistake the presence of a payment button for progress. But as Dearborn pointed out, that’s just Stage 1. And it’s barely the beginning.

From Enablement to Monetization — and Why Most Stall in the Middle

Dearborn described embedded payments maturity as a three-stage journey: enablement, customer value creation and monetization. It’s a simple framework with a not-so-simple implication. Most companies haven’t made it past Stage 2. Many aren’t even close.

Stage 1 is about enabling payments. That means getting them up and running, even if they sit off to the side. This is where low-code tools and turnkey integrations show up. Payments get processed, but the platform isn’t really part of the transaction.

“It might be windowed, where the payment runs in parallel to the service being provided,” Dearborn said. “There’s very little integration, very little transparency, but at least there’s a way to pay.”

Stage 2 is where payments get embedded more deeply, when they disappear into the user experience. It’s no longer about simply enabling a transaction but using the payment to remove friction and strengthen brand control. The goal is a seamless experience that feels like part of the product, not an add-on.

As Dearborn put it, “Is the payment branded yours, seamless? Is it transparent?”

The right benchmark is Amazon, he said, not because every software platform needs to replicate it, but because Amazon represents the standard for what payments should feel like: instant, invisible and fully owned.

Then, Dearborn told Webster, the hard question needs to be asked: How far away from that are you?

Friction Isn’t a Feature

Reducing friction may sound obvious, but it’s where many embedded payment efforts quietly stall. That’s especially true in B2B environments, where complexity gets in the way of clean execution.

Webster asked if Stage 2 is even realistic for platforms managing complex transactions between businesses.

It’s more difficult but not impossible, Dearborn said.

“In B2B, rather than one-off transactions, we often have to complete many, many transactions,” he said. “We’d like to do them digitally, and we’d like to do them intelligently. That means tying invoice numbers, traveler reservations or insurance claims to the payment itself.”

When that happens, payments become more than a way to settle, Dearborn said. They become a source of insight. That data can be analyzed, returned to the platform, and used to improve performance, either for the software company or its customers. Embedded payments, done right, create a flywheel.

Friction still kills, however. The two metrics that matter most are the number of clicks to complete a payment and the cart abandonment rate, Dearborn said.

“Anything beyond one click is too many,” he said.

If users are abandoning the experience before the transaction completes, the experience isn’t embedded; it’s bolted on.

The problem is that too many software companies think reaching Stage 2 means the journey is over. But it’s the halfway point, and stopping there leaves value on the table, Dearborn said.

Stage 3: Where the Real Money Is

Stage 3 is about turning embedded payments into a profit center. That’s where Dearborn said he sees the biggest gap and the biggest opportunity.

“It almost takes someone to bring payments expertise onto the leadership team,” he said.

Software companies are good at building great products, but payments is a domain business. Without deep expertise — or the right partner — the monetization piece rarely materializes, he said.

That monetization comes in several forms. Dearborn said to start with participating in card economics, which means taking a slice of the acquiring fee, issuing virtual cards or receiving rebates through ACH+ networks.

“This whole concept of rebate is one source of monetization,” Dearborn said.

It’s not flashy, but it adds up — especially at scale.

Next is participating in the funds flow itself. Companies that sit inside the accounts payable process, route payments and control disbursements aren’t just facilitators. They’re operators, and operators get paid.

“Think of AP automation players as technology companies participating in the funds flow,” he said. “That income is meaningful.”

Then comes network monetization. Software platforms don’t just process payments; they connect buyers and sellers. That connection creates a closed-loop network that can be optimized, priced and monetized — without ever touching the payment itself, he said.

“You’re not necessarily monetizing the payment but the network that exists within these platforms,” Webster said.

That’s not the only monetizable layer. Speed matters too. Instant access to funds — on either side of a transaction — creates tangible value. Buyers are more likely to pay early. Sellers get paid faster. That value can be priced, packaged and monetized.

“You can build an ecosystem around that account, that payment credential,” Dearborn said. “That’s the next unlock.”

A Framework for the Next Move

The gap between Stage 2 and Stage 3 isn’t just technical; it’s strategic. It requires payments talent, clear KPIs and a business model that sees payments as something more than a cost center or convenience layer.

Dearborn offered three questions to help CEOs assess their readiness.

  • Are payments seamless, secure and operating under your brand?
  • Are you capturing transaction-level data and using it to improve experience?
  • Are you monetizing payments — creatively and deliberately?

If the answer to any of those is no, the embedded payments journey isn’t finished, Dearborn said. It may not even be fully underway.

Embedded payments are table stakes, he said. Embedding them well and building a business around them is still a competitive edge. Software platforms that get this right won’t just move the money. They’ll keep more of it.

And that’s the point.

Register now to access all streaming and on-demand videos from the Summer School Series 2025. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fintech

Speed Raises $8 Million to Expand Bitcoin and Stablecoin Payment Solutions | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

The company will use the new funding to build capacity, expand to new regions, develop more merchant tools, enable cross-border and creator payouts, and maintain reliability and compliance, it said in a Tuesday (Dec. 16) blog post.

Speed’s offerings include a global payment layer called Speed Merchant that is designed for merchants, platforms and payment systems and enables them to accept both Bitcoin and stablecoins, according to the post.

The company also offers a Lightning wallet called Speed Wallet that serves individuals and businesses and enables Bitcoin and stablecoin transfers, supports global payouts, offers local on- and off-ramps, and powers USDT transactions, the post said.

“We’ve always believed that Bitcoin and stablecoins can power everyday payments,” Speed CEO Niraj Patel said in the post. “That requires real infrastructure—fast, compliant and scalable. This investment validates that belief and accelerates our mission.”

Speed co-founder Jayneel Patel said in the post that the company aims to “solve real problems with technology.”

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

“Speed started as a merchant solution and has grown into a global payment network,” Jayneel Patel said, adding the company is “ready to take the next leap.”

Stablecoin issuer Tether and venture fund ego death capital co-led the funding round, per the post.

Tether said in a Tuesday press release that its investment supports its strategy to support Bitcoin-aligned financial infrastructure and expand the utility of its USDT stablecoin in real-world payment environments.

“We support teams building practical infrastructure that reduces friction in payments and expands access to reliable settlement rails,” Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said in the release.

Tether’s USDT stablecoin is the most traded cryptocurrency by volume around the world.

Adam Gebner, associate at ego death capital, said in a Tuesday blog post that Speed processed over $1.5 billion in payment volume over the past 12 months and serves more than 1.2 million users.

“By bridging Lightning and stablecoins in a single, compliant platform, Speed is positioning itself as foundational infrastructure for the Bitcoin and stablecoin economy, serving merchants, platforms and users across both developed and emerging markets,” Gebner said in the post.

Continue Reading

Fintech

Databricks Targets $134 Billion Valuation in New Funding Round | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Data analytics/artificial intelligence (AI) firm Databricks is reportedly raising $4 billion in a new funding round.

This Series L round would value the company at $134 billion, up 34% from its last session of funding during the summer, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported Tuesday (Dec. 16).

Ali Ghodsi, Databricks’ co-founder and CEO, told the WSJ the company plans to use the new funding to invest in its core data-analytics products and AI software, while also letting its workers engage in secondary share sales.

The company, among the most valuable private firms in Silicon Valley, also plans to hire around 600 fresh college graduates in 2026, the CEO added, in addition to adding thousands of new jobs worldwide in Asia, Latin America and Europe. It also plans to hire AI researchers, who are typically paid top salaries, the WSJ added.

The report noted that Databricks has benefited from the AI boom, which relies partially on private corporate data to customize AI models. Databricks told the WSJ that its data-warehousing product, which can serve as an underlying data platform for AI services, surpassed a $1 billion revenue run rate at the end of October.

This year has seen Databricks ink deals with OpenAI and Anthropic to help sell AI services to business customers. Each of these partnerships are designed to push clients to develop AI agents, or independent bots that can carry out tasks on behalf of humans.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

The company’s new funding round comes three months after Databricks’ Series K round, which valued it more than $100 billion, up from $62 billion at the start of the year.

In other AI news, PYMNTS wrote earlier this week about The General Intelligence Company of New York, a start up developing agent-based systems designed to take over large portions of company operations.

“The company’s name deliberately evokes Gilded Age ambition, and founder Andrew Pignanelli told PYMNTS that the reference was intentional,” that report said. “He said he views AI as foundational infrastructure for the next era of company-building, much as railroads and industrial capital reshaped the United States economy more than a century ago.”

The company started by working backward from “the one-person billion-dollar business,” as Pignanelli termed it.

“We started at the end, the actual one-person billion-dollar company, and worked our way back and we were like, ‘What can we do today?’” he said.

Continue Reading

Fintech

Apple App Store Fees Face Pressure From EU Developers | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

A collection of app developers and consumer groups want Europe to enforce laws against Apple.

The Coalition of App Fairness (CAF) on Monday (Dec. 15) issued an open letter to the European Commission (EC) accusing the tech giant of “persistent” non-compliance with Europe’s Digital Markets Act (DMA).

The letter follows findings from the EC that Apple had violated the DMA by keeping developers from directing users to alternative payment methods, fining the tech giant $588 million.

Apple in turn revised its terms for its app store to impose fees that ranged from from 13% for smaller businesses to up to 20% for App Store purchases. However, the CAF says Apple has not addressed what it calls a core issue: the company’s fees are preventing fair competition.

“The law says that gatekeepers like Apple must allow developers to offer and conduct transactions outside of the App Store free of charge,” the letter said. “However, Apple is now charging developers commission, fees of up to 20% for such transactions. This is a blatant disregard for the law with the potential to vanquish years of meaningful work by the Commission.”

The CAF also notes that Apple plans to introduce new terms and conditions for the App Store next month, and says it suspects the new terms will include fees that violate the DMA.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

“Apple cannot be permitted to exploit its gatekeeper position by holding the entire industry hostage,” the letter added.

PYMNTS has contacted Apple for comment but has not yet gotten a reply. The company had in September called on the commission to rethink the DMA, which was created to prevent market abuse by tech giants doing business in Europe.

“Over that time, it’s become clear that the DMA is leading to a worse experience for Apple users in the EU,” Apple wrote in a blog post. “It’s exposing them to new risks, and disrupting the simple, seamless way their Apple products work together. And as new technologies come out, our European users’ Apple products will only fall further behind.”

In its blog post, Apple argued the DMA requirements for allowing other app marketplaces and alternative payment systems don’t take into account the privacy and security standards of the App Store, putting customers at risk for being overcharged or scammed.

“The DMA also lets other companies request access to user data and core technologies of Apple products,” the company wrote. “Apple is required to meet almost every request, even if they create serious risks for our users.”

Continue Reading

Trending