Connect with us

Fintech

Ingo CEO Says Payouts Are the New Instant Paycheck | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

As businesses rush to offer instant payment capabilities, there’s the danger of simply checking the box rather than embedding these capabilities into a broader, more strategic money mobility framework.

This short-sighted approach risks commoditization and being left behind by more innovative competitors, Ingo Payments CEO Drew Edwards told Karen Webster.

“The trade-off, at a minimum, is that they’re going to be facing a race to the bottom, which every company does when they focus on a transaction for a fee that then scales,” Edwards said as part of the “What’s Next in Payments series” on trade-offs. “Competitors come in, and you have no walls to defend that.”

Quick wins fade; long-term strategy is what matters most.

Instant payments are now table stakes for how money moves between businesses and consumers. PYMNTS Intelligence, in collaboration with Ingo Payments, found that when given the choice, people consistently opt for speed, making it a sender’s responsibility to deliver money instantly.

Edwards said the critical discussion point is often about “instant payouts,” as the “pay-in” side is already largely instant. The exception here is for account funding from checks, cards and accounts where there is settlement and return item risk.

 

Not Fully Committed

However, many businesses, particularly FinTechs, have not fully committed to the potential of instant payouts.

“They haven’t gone all the way,” Edwards said, adding that “they’ve chosen one faster payment rail; checked the box; said, ‘OK, we did it’; and they’ve moved on to other initiatives.”

This limited approach often means companies are implementing solutions like real-time payments or push to card without exploring broader choices or innovative features such as “pay for speed,” which capitalizes on the fact that customers are willing to pay fees to have the surety of instant payouts.

The stage has been set, given that the concept of “money mobility” has evolved through the past few years, Edwards said. Initially centered around a single bank account, it has shifted as consumers embrace numerous specialized accounts — from investment platforms like Robinhood to savings accounts like Marcus.

Capitalizing on Recurring Income

A greenfield opportunity for instant payouts lies with their application to recurring payment flows, especially those serving the burgeoning gig economy and individuals with multiple income streams — so payouts become the “new paycheck,” Edwards said.

Webster said focusing on recurring flows is akin to “capturing a different relationship with that receiver by giving them a mechanism to take that payment and [in doing so] create a different branded relationship with that sender.”

“We’ve moved past that world where we all pick a bank, we go stand in line, we open a relationship, and we use their money mobility,” Edwards said.

Instead, each payout represents a potential deposit, an opportunity to build a new account relationship, with the chance to wrap layers of value into those relationships, forging ecosystems and a “delightful bank account” experience that is interoperable across a range of activities, he said.

“It’s a win-win-win scenario,” he told Webster, benefiting Ingo Payments, its partners and receivers, and leading to improved visibility, data and enduring relationships that transcend the initial transaction.

Ingo’s Blueprint: Owning Risk and Reshaping Economics

Despite the opportunities, many senders do not yet fully recognize the potential to rethink their payout workflows and need the aid of a provider like Ingo.

“Right now, at least in my universe, they are all consumed with the cost of these payouts and whether or not they have margin in them,” Edwards said. “On top of that, they’re consumed with the risk. They ask, ‘What about fraud? Am I earning enough to even make up for the potential of somebody taking me to the cleaners on fraudulent activity? Am I doing anything [here that I don’t understand] that’s going to get me in trouble down the road?’”

There’s a common denominator, as none of these firms are in the banking business and therefore can lack a deep understanding of payments, risk and financial services.

“The very definition of [embedded banking] is to embed a new banking relationship into a non-financial solution,” and this can be daunting, Edwards said.

Ingo Payments steps in to dispel those doubts and own the entire burden of cost, fraud, risk and compliance, effectively making it a turnkey operation for partners spanning verticals such as restaurants, property management, gaming, daily staffing or trucking.

Ingo’s model, built on experience with embedded check cashing solutions, aims to transform payouts into embedded banking relationships. The company’s platform underwrites inbound money flows into the prefund account and issues new accounts to recipients of payouts with Ingo handling the compliance and risk. However, these new accounts are not just prepaid cards with limited functionality and economics wrapped around breakage. These instantly provisioned accounts come with branded mobile banking experiences that offer recipients a range of money mobility choices — from cashing checks and pulling money from other accounts to P2P transfers, bill pay, ATM access and, of course, spending. The model aims to capture existing economic activity that would otherwise flow out of the ecosystem to traditional banks, such as Chase or Bank of America.

“At the end of the day, everybody’s got better visibility, better data,” Edwards said, “… and these are relationships that last even after that transactional [part of the] relationship ends.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fintech

Coupa Adds Tariff Impact Planning to Supply Chain Tool | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

The Tariff Impact Planning app, part of the spend management platform’s supply chain solution, is designed to help businesses navigate global trade policy, Coupa said in a Wednesday (Aug. 6) news release.

“A lasting trade war could be a black swan event with seismic impacts to supply chains, the likes of which we haven’t seen since the COVID-19 pandemic,” Dean Bain, Coupa senior vice president and general manager of supply chain, said in the release.

“As we’ve seen before, supply chains are extremely fragile, and the potential for severe disruptions create dramatic downstream business challenges for each of our customers.”

The release notes that more than half of CEOs say trade wars are the top geopolitical risk. To ease those concerns, Coupa says it’s designed the tool to let companies design supply chains that assess “current networks, future implications, and alternate strategies” to balance tariff reduction and operational efficiency, and safeguard their bottom lines.

As PYMNTS wrote Wednesday, tariff levels may fluctuate, but a lack of “visibility into future policy has become a binding constraint on strategic planning.”

Data from PYMNTS Intelligence’s June 2025 edition of The 2025 Certainty Project, “Tariff Uncertainty Craters Confidence to Zero at Exposed Consumer Goods Companies,” shows an eye-opening number: not one chief financial officer — zero percent — in the exposed goods sector had any confidence in their company’s ability to navigate the current tariff environment.

The report points to an increasing imbalance between operational execution and strategic development. Rapid shifts in tariffs — sometimes implemented on short notice or as part of wider diplomatic disputes — can hinder the planning cycles that mid-sized firms rely on for capital budgeting and contract negotiation.

More than half of all finance chiefs across industries said they have delayed or canceled capital investments because of tariff policy volatility. The figure was even higher — 63% — among consumer goods firms with large levels of import exposure. These delays affect initiatives ranging from expansion into new markets to supply chain digitization and product innovation.

The report found that a growing number of CFOs are implementing software systems that support scenario planning and tariff exposure modeling. These tools aim to help firms assess how cost structures may shift under various policy outcomes — and to tweak their sourcing, pricing and inventory strategies accordingly.

“At the same time, companies themselves are rethinking what resilience means,” PYMNTS wrote. “Increasingly, strategic agility is replacing efficiency as the core operational objective — a shift that may ultimately make mid-market firms more robust, but also more conservative.”

For all PYMNTS B2B coverage, subscribe to the daily B2B Newsletter.

Continue Reading

Fintech

AWS Offers OpenAI’s Models on Its Platform for the First Time | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

For the first time, OpenAI’s artificial intelligence models are available on a cloud computing platform outside of Microsoft, its largest investor to date.

AWS, in competition with Microsoft Azure for cloud market share, announced in a Tuesday (Aug. 5) press release that it will offer OpenAI’s two new open-weight models on its Bedrock platform.

OpenAI is considered the marquee brand in AI, but its models have only been available in the cloud on Microsoft Azure. All of OpenAI’s proprietary AI models are contractually exclusive to Microsoft, its early and largest investor.

OpenAI released its gpt-oss models in 120 billion and 20 billion parameters Tuesday. These open-weight models are available to anyone, including AWS. OpenAI has not had an open model since GPT-2 in 2019.

AWS’ celebratory tone at getting access to OpenAI models was apparent in the Tuesday blog post of its chief evangelist, Danilo Poccia.

“I am happy to announce the availability of two new OpenAI models with open weights” are now available on two of AWS’ platforms, he wrote in the post.

AWS created a landing page image featuring their two logos side by side, usually reserved for partners jointly announcing an alliance.

While anyone can access all of OpenAI’s models directly through its API rather than going through Microsoft Azure or AWS, enterprises need the robust compliance, security and expertise that hyperscalers provide.

However, OpenAI’s open-weight models are not truly open source in the sense that users cannot access the code and see what dataset was used to assess it for bias and other harms. OpenAI offered them under the Apache 2.0 license that lets anyone use, modify and distribute the models if there is proper attribution and a built-in grant of patent rights.

“OpenAI’s open-weight models may not represent the ‘leading-edge’ models” with capabilities “more similar” to a lightweight version of the flagship GPT-4 model, but they “do fit well with Amazon’s cost savings strategy,” wrote BofA analyst Justin Post in a research note shared with PYMNTS.

AWS said in its Tuesday blog post that OpenAI’s larger open-weight model gives enterprises 10 times more value for the price versus a comparable Gemini model, 18 times more than DeepSeek R1, and seven times over OpenAI’s o4 model. (Gemini and OpenAI o4-mini are proprietary; DeepSeek is open source.)

Poccia said in his blog post that the models “excel at coding, scientific analysis and mathematical reasoning, with performance comparable to leading alternatives.” The models also work with external tools and can be used in an “agentic workflow.”

AWS, a subsidiary of Amazon, already offers open models such as Meta’s Llama, DeepSeek and Mistral. It also offers Claude from Anthropic, in which Amazon has invested $8 billion. Claude, a main rival of OpenAI’s AI models, was not mentioned in the AWS press release.

“We see the addition of OpenAI to the AWS platform, while far from a comprehensive deal, as a positive initial step in the relationship, suggesting the companies are interested in working together,” Post said.

For all PYMNTS AI coverage, subscribe to the daily AI Newsletter.

Read more:

OpenAI Targets $500 Billion Valuation in Share Sale

Anthropic Unveils Claude Opus 4.1 in Dueling Releases With OpenAI

Anthropic Yanks OpenAI’s Access to Claude Model

Continue Reading

Fintech

New Data Shows Women Decide When and How to Cut Back | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

When it comes to escaping the paycheck-to-paycheck grind, men are more likely than women to think they can simply tighten their belts.

However, women, who are responsible for managing daily expenses, have a better sense of what can and can’t be cut when it comes to improving the monthly cash flow.

A PYMNTS Intelligence “Paycheck-to-Paycheck” analysis of 1,475 U.S. consumers found that the gender gap is wide enough to drive a budget spreadsheet through. Asked whether they could stop living paycheck to paycheck if their earnings stayed flat but their spending changed, nearly 1 in 3 men said “absolutely.” Fewer than 1 in 5 women said the same.

The split persisted even after leveling the family expense playing field. Married men maintained their conviction in the money makeover, and dads with kids under 18 were no less bullish than bachelors.

However, optimism must often crash up against reality, especially in an environment where inflation is stubborn and price increases are fueled by tariffs. The data showed that more than two-thirds of consumers live paycheck to paycheck, so finding some way to improve the ebb and flow of cash flow is paramount.

Women often quarterback day-to-day household finances and caregiving budgets, so they see the hard limits on discretionary cuts. Men, by contrast, may underestimate fixed costs.

PYMNTS Intelligence researchers drilled down into two statistically subsamples: 804 married respondents and 541 parents with children under 18. In each sample, participants answered the same core question: “If your income stayed the same, could you stop living paycheck to paycheck by changing how you spend?” Response options were a simple “Yes” or “No,” enabling a clean measurement of financial self-assessment.

Key Data Highlights:

  • Overall Consumers Living Paycheck to Paycheck: Twenty-eight percent of men said they could break the cycle through spending changes alone, compared with 19% of women — an optimism gap of nine percentage points.
  • Married Consumers: Thirty-six percent of husbands said belt-tightening would do the trick, versus 21% of wives — showing that shared mortgages and grocery bills don’t do much to erase women’s views that cash flow pressures persist.
  • Parents With Children Under 18: Thirty-six percent of fathers living paycheck to paycheck were sure that spending tweaks would suffice, but only 23% of mothers agreed, underscoring that caretaking costs — tied to everything from school to recreation — weighed more heavily on women’s calculations.

The disparity is not merely about who shoulders more fixed expenses. Instead, respondents’ commentary suggested a behavioral explanation. Women more often manage family budgets and caregiving outlays, giving them a clearer view of non-negotiable costs. Men, who are less likely to run the household balance sheet, may assume more wiggle room than actually exists.

For banks, FinTechs and payments players, there’s a key takeaway and an opportunity to work with their customers to shore up the status of the household finances. Financial wellness tools, including budgeting apps, must account for gendered perceptions, not just gendered pay gaps, to improve cash flow and financial security.

Continue Reading

Trending