The adoption of AI for enterprise treasury management enables businesses to abandon manual spreadsheets for automated data pipelines.

Corporate finance departments face pressure from market volatility, regulatory demands, and digital finance requirements. Ashish Kumar, head of Infosys Oracle Sales for North America, and CM Grover, CEO of IBS FinTech, recently discussed the realities of corporate treasuries.

IBS FinTech has operated for 19 years and currently ranks in the top five globally according to an IDC report. Grover notes that while AI-powered automation has reached many areas of corporate life, treasury departments often still rely on manual spreadsheets.

“IBS FinTech has identified the gap in the CFO’s office in corporations where they are managing their most critical information system, that is, treasury management on Excel,” Grover said.

Treasury teams manage cash, liquidity, and risk. Companies face foreign currency risk through imports and exports, alongside related commodity risks. Cash surplus companies also need to invest in operations to generate returns.

The key problem for many enterprises is a lack of real-time data connection. Teams often execute trades on platforms like Bloomberg, Reuters, or 360D, manually enter the data into spreadsheets, and then post accounting entries into an enterprise resource planning system.

Successfully implementing AI in enterprise treasury management

AI implementations in finance depend on resolving these manual bottlenecks. Enterprise leaders often view the technology as a fast solution, but the technology requires digitised and automated data as a foundation.

“It is not by talking you can do AI in treasury,” Grover said. “You have to create that underlying data set that has to be digitised and automated.”

Integrating treasury management systems with existing enterprise resource planning platforms allows companies to establish this data foundation. IBS FinTech built its backend on Oracle databases from its inception and now integrates with Oracle Cloud, NetSuite, and Fusion.

A connected ecosystem requires the treasury management system to communicate directly with the enterprise resource planning platform, trading platforms, and banks. This integration provides executives with accurate information to manage liquidity, mitigate risk, and monitor compliance violations across the system.

Grover expects global volatility to increase due to geopolitical and economic factors impacting commodities, equities, and foreign exchange. Executives must prioritise automation and real-time information systems to operate in this uncertain environment.

Kumar noted that modernising treasury management with AI and connecting it to enterprise resource planning systems builds financial resilience. Enterprise leaders should audit their existing data workflows. If a finance team relies on manual entry between a trading platform and an enterprise resource planning platform, AI initiatives will fail due to poor data quality.

Implementing direct integrations ensures data flows in real time without error, providing the necessary baseline for future technology deployment.

See also: DBS pilots system that lets AI agents make payments for customers

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

For leaders in the financial sector, the experimental phase of generative AI has concluded and the focus for 2026 is operational integration.

While early adoption centred on content generation and efficiency in isolated workflows, the current requirement is to industrialise these capabilities. The objective is to create systems where AI agents do not merely assist human operators, but actively run processes within strict governance frameworks.

This transition presents specific architectural and cultural challenges. It requires a move from disparate tools to joined-up systems that manage data signals, decision logic, and execution layers simultaneously.

Financial institutions integrate agentic AI workflows

The primary bottleneck in scaling AI within financial services is no longer the availability of models or creative application, it is coordination. Marketing and customer experience teams often struggle to convert decisions into action due to friction between legacy systems, compliance approvals, and data silos.

Saachin Bhatt, Co-Founder and COO at Brdge, notes the distinction between current tools and future requirements: “An assistant helps you write faster. A copilot helps teams move faster. Agents run processes.”

For enterprise architects, this means building what Bhatt terms a ‘Moments Engine’. This operating model functions through five distinct stages:

• Signals: Detecting real-time events in the customer journey.

• Decisions: Determining the appropriate algorithmic response.

• Message: Generating communication aligned with brand parameters.

• Routing: Automated triage to determine if human approval is required.

• Action and learning: Deployment and feedback loop integration.

Most organisations possess components of this architecture but lack the integration to make it function as a unified system. The technical goal is to reduce the friction that slows down customer interactions. This involves creating pipelines where data flows seamlessly from signal detection to execution, minimising latency while maintaining security.

Governance as infrastructure

In high-stakes environments like banking and insurance, speed cannot come at the cost of control. Trust remains the primary commercial asset. Consequently, governance must be treated as a technical feature rather than a bureaucratic hurdle.

The integration of AI into financial decision-making requires “guardrails” that are hard-coded into the system. This ensures that while AI agents can execute tasks autonomously, they operate within pre-defined risk parameters.

Farhad Divecha, Group CEO at Accuracast, suggests that creative optimisation must become a continuous loop where data-led insights feed innovation. However, this loop requires rigorous quality assurance workflows to ensure output never compromises brand integrity.

For technical teams, this implies a shift in how compliance is handled. Rather than a final check, regulatory requirements must be embedded into the prompt engineering and model fine-tuning stages.

“Legitimate interest is interesting, but it’s also where a lot of companies could trip up,” observes Jonathan Bowyer, former Marketing Director at Lloyds Banking Group. He argues that regulations like Consumer Duty help by forcing an outcome-based approach.

Technical leaders must work with risk teams to ensure AI-driven activity attests to brand values. This includes transparency protocols. Customers should know when they are interacting with an AI, and systems must provide a clear escalation path to human operators.

Data architecture for restraint

A common failure mode in personalisation engines is over-engagement. The technical capability to message a customer exists, but the logic to determine restraint is often missing. Effective personalisation relies on anticipation (i.e. knowing when to remain silent is as important as knowing when to speak.)

Jonathan Bowyer points out that personalisation has moved to anticipation. “Customers now expect brands to know when not to speak to them as opposed to when to speak to them.”

This requires a data architecture capable of cross-referencing customer context across multiple channels – including branches, apps, and contact centres – in real-time. If a customer is in financial distress, a marketing algorithm pushing a loan product creates a disconnect that erodes trust. The system must be capable of detecting negative signals and suppressing standard promotional workflows.

“The thing that kills trust is when you go to one channel and then move to another and have to answer the same questions all over again,” says Bowyer. Solving this requires unifying data stores so that the “memory” of the institution is accessible to every agent (whether digital or human) at the point of interaction.

The rise of generative search and SEO

In the age of AI, the discovery layer for financial products is changing. Traditional search engine optimisation (SEO) focused on driving traffic to owned properties. The emergence of AI-generated answers means that brand visibility now occurs off-site, within the interface of an LLM or AI search tool.

“Digital PR and off-site SEO is returning to focus because generative AI answers are not confined to content pulled directly from a company’s website,” notes Divecha.

For CIOs and CDOs, this changes how information is structured and published. Technical SEO must evolve to ensure that the data fed into large language models is accurate and compliant. 

Organisations that can confidently distribute high-quality information across the wider ecosystem gain reach without sacrificing control. This area, often termed ‘Generative Engine Optimisation’ (GEO), requires a technical strategy to ensure the brand is recommended and cited correctly by third-party AI agents.

Structured agility

There is a misconception that agility equates to a lack of structure. In regulated industries, the opposite is true.

Agile methodologies require strict frameworks to function safely. Ingrid Sierra, Brand and Marketing Director at Zego, explains: “There’s often confusion between agility and chaos. Calling something ‘agile’ doesn’t make it okay for everything to be improvised and unstructured.”

For technical leadership, this means systemising predictable work to create capacity for experimentation. It involves creating safe sandboxes where teams can test new AI agents or data models without risking production stability.

Agility starts with mindset, requiring staff who are willing to experiment. However, this experimentation must be deliberate. It requires collaboration between technical, marketing, and legal teams from the outset.

This “compliance-by-design” approach allows for faster iteration because the parameters of safety are established before the code is written.

What’s next for AI in the financial sector?

Looking further ahead, the financial ecosystem will likely see direct interaction between AI agents acting on behalf of consumers and agents acting for institutions.

Melanie Lazarus, Ecosystem Engagement Director at Open Banking, warns: “We are entering a world where AI agents interact with each other, and that changes the foundations of consent, authentication, and authorisation.”

Tech leaders must begin architecting frameworks that protect customers in this agent-to-agent reality. This involves new protocols for identity verification and API security to ensure that an automated financial advisor acting for a client can securely interact with a bank’s infrastructure.

The mandate for 2026 is to turn the potential of AI into a reliable P&L driver. This requires a focus on infrastructure over hype and leaders must prioritise:

• Unifying data streams: Ensure signals from all channels feed into a central decision engine to enable context-aware actions.

• Hard-coding governance: Embed compliance rules into the AI workflow to allow for safe automation.

• Agentic orchestration: Move beyond chatbots to agents that can execute end-to-end processes.

• Generative optimisation: Structure public data to be readable and prioritised by external AI search engines.

Success will depend on how well these technical elements are integrated with human oversight. The winning organisations will be those that use AI automation to enhance, rather than replace, the judgment that is especially required in sectors like financial services.

See also: Goldman Sachs deploys Anthropic systems with success

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

Although business leaders may be already in partnership with alternative service providers other than Infosys, the company’s strategy of demarcating the necessary action areas for AI implementations offers significant value. The six areas described provide practical reference points that can be used in any organisation to plan projects or perhaps monitor and assess ongoing implementation efforts.

Among these, data preparation is central. AI systems depend on data quality and consistency, so investment in data platforms, data governance, and engineering practices that support models is central tenet on which AI initiatives are built.

Embedding AI into workflows means it’s sometimes necessary to redesign the way employees work. Leaders should be aware of how AI agents and employees interact, and measure performance improvements. Changes can be made both to the technologies deployed and the working methods that have existed to date. If the latter, retraining and educating affected employees will be necessary, with accompanying costs.

The issue of legacy systems requires careful attention as many organisations operate complex estates that limit the agility necessary for AI to improve operations. AI tools themselves can help to analyse existing dependencies and even plan modernisation, implemented, ideally, over several stages or in separate sprints.

Physical operations intersect increasingly with digital systems. For companies with physical products, such as in manufacturing or logistics, embedding AI into devices and equipment can improve monitoring and devices’ responsiveness. This will require coordination between IT, OT, engineering, and operational teams, and line-of-business leaders should be consulted in particular.

Governance should accompany any scale of AI implementation. Risk assessment, security testing, security policy formulation, and the design of AI-specific guardrails should be established early on. Regulatory scrutiny of AI is increasing, particularly in sectors handling sensitive data, and statutory penalties apply for data loss or mismanagement, regardless of its source – AI or otherwise – in the enterprise. Clear accountability structures and documentation reduce these risks to operations and reputation.

Taken together, these areas indicate that AI implementation is organisational rather than purely technical. Success depends on leadership alignment, sustained investment, and realistic assessment of any capability gaps. Claims of rapid transformation should be treated cautiously, and durable results are more likely when strategy, data, process design, modernisation, operational integration, and governance are addressed in parallel.

(Image source: “Infosys, Bangalore, India” by theqspeaks is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.)

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other leading technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.