Connect with us

Fintech

Crypto Market Pushes Yield Boundaries With GENIUS Act Implementation in Holding Pattern | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

The GENIUS Act, which aims to regulate stablecoins in the United States, was enacted on July 18.

However, the policy hasn’t yet been implemented, leaving cryptocurrency firms, stablecoin issuers and would-be stablecoin issuers in limbo.

The reason for the holding pattern? The act’s most important provisions cannot function until the U.S. Department of the Treasury releases implementing regulations covering reserve composition, disclosures, affiliate relationships and the precise definition of “yield.”

That vacuum is now producing follow-on consequences. Arrangers, banks, FinTech lenders and crypto-native issuers are racing to test the boundaries of the statute before regulators have locked down the guardrails and their corresponding definitions.

Anchorage Digital, for example, reportedly announced Tuesday (Nov. 25) that it aims to offer stablecoin rewards through a legally distinct affiliate, insisting that this structure complies with the GENIUS Act’s prohibitions on yield.

Anchorage may have opened a path that other stablecoin issuers, including nonbanks, could seize before the Treasury Department finalizes rules. Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota reportedly said the Senate has embraced the position that any attempt to revisit the GENIUS Act’s language and framework by lawmakers will have to wait until after implementation by federal agencies.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

The move might have far-reaching implications for the banking industry, which is trying to stop stablecoin issuers from offering yield and has aggressively campaigned on the issue.

Read also: Bitcoin-Backed Stablecoins Top List of GENIUS Act Loopholes

Traditional Banking’s Fight Against Stablecoin Yield

The GENIUS Act was intended to stabilize the U.S. stablecoin ecosystem by clarifying roles, responsibilities and risks. Yet its most consequential provisions now hinge on definitions that do not yet exist. In that vacuum, Anchorage’s affiliate-reward model may be the first in a wave of industry innovation testing the law’s boundaries.

The prospect of stablecoins offering yield is, in many ways, a challenge to banks’ core business model. If consumers can hold a tokenized dollar fully backed by Treasuries, transferred in real-time across networks, and potentially earn a yield equivalent to or better than a savings account, it could spark deposit drain across local and regional lenders more sensitive to the flight of their customer accounts than larger institutional lenders.

The GENIUS Act represented a partial win for banks. Congress banned stablecoin issuers from paying yield directly. However, banks say that unless regulators take an expansive interpretation of yield, affiliate structures could become a loophole big enough to reshape the deposit market.

The Treasury Department responded to the new law by issuing a request for public comment in September, posing some 58 questions on topics ranging from reserve composition and redemption practices to the meaning of “pay,” “interest,” “yield,” and “solely” under Section 4(a)(11).

Industry groups such as the American Bankers Association, the Bank Policy Institute and the Consumer Bankers Association have pressed senators to prohibit any yield-related incentives tied to stablecoin holdings, regardless of the corporate separation. They have also lobbied the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve to issue guidance discouraging banks from partnering with stablecoin programs that engage in yield-adjacent products.

PYMNTS reported separately that banks have their own efforts to enter the stablecoin custody space, and these lenders are “planting flags in a future financial architecture where tokenized assets and stablecoins become mainstream.”

See also: Stablecoins, Not FinTechs, Are Forcing Community Banks to Rethink the Future

Broader Implications for Banks, FinTech and Crypto

For many stakeholders across the financial services space, the GENIUS Act was never intended to turn stablecoins into savings accounts. By using affiliates to pay yield, or something that in practice may resemble yield, stablecoin issuers could risk undoing the very safeguards Congress tried to build, including separation of banking and commerce, deposit-base integrity and consumer protection.

Traditional banks see these early moves as a quiet warning that stablecoin competition could soon reach their core business lines. FinTechs may see an opportunity to differentiate. Crypto natives could see legal gaps ripe for exploration. Neobanks, for their part, may see a chance to blend stablecoin liquidity with consumer-friendly rewards in ways traditional institutions cannot match.

This scenario underscores the broader tension. The GENIUS Act was designed to protect banking stability while fostering payments innovation. But in the interim, it may be encouraging the very competitive dynamics banks hoped to avoid.

As the Treasury Department writes the rules, the market is already writing the future. The next year will reveal whether affiliate-based stablecoin rewards become a temporary curiosity, a meaningful loophole or the beginning of a new competitive era in digital money.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fintech

Speed Raises $8 Million to Expand Bitcoin and Stablecoin Payment Solutions | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

The company will use the new funding to build capacity, expand to new regions, develop more merchant tools, enable cross-border and creator payouts, and maintain reliability and compliance, it said in a Tuesday (Dec. 16) blog post.

Speed’s offerings include a global payment layer called Speed Merchant that is designed for merchants, platforms and payment systems and enables them to accept both Bitcoin and stablecoins, according to the post.

The company also offers a Lightning wallet called Speed Wallet that serves individuals and businesses and enables Bitcoin and stablecoin transfers, supports global payouts, offers local on- and off-ramps, and powers USDT transactions, the post said.

“We’ve always believed that Bitcoin and stablecoins can power everyday payments,” Speed CEO Niraj Patel said in the post. “That requires real infrastructure—fast, compliant and scalable. This investment validates that belief and accelerates our mission.”

Speed co-founder Jayneel Patel said in the post that the company aims to “solve real problems with technology.”

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

“Speed started as a merchant solution and has grown into a global payment network,” Jayneel Patel said, adding the company is “ready to take the next leap.”

Stablecoin issuer Tether and venture fund ego death capital co-led the funding round, per the post.

Tether said in a Tuesday press release that its investment supports its strategy to support Bitcoin-aligned financial infrastructure and expand the utility of its USDT stablecoin in real-world payment environments.

“We support teams building practical infrastructure that reduces friction in payments and expands access to reliable settlement rails,” Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said in the release.

Tether’s USDT stablecoin is the most traded cryptocurrency by volume around the world.

Adam Gebner, associate at ego death capital, said in a Tuesday blog post that Speed processed over $1.5 billion in payment volume over the past 12 months and serves more than 1.2 million users.

“By bridging Lightning and stablecoins in a single, compliant platform, Speed is positioning itself as foundational infrastructure for the Bitcoin and stablecoin economy, serving merchants, platforms and users across both developed and emerging markets,” Gebner said in the post.

Continue Reading

Fintech

Databricks Targets $134 Billion Valuation in New Funding Round | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Data analytics/artificial intelligence (AI) firm Databricks is reportedly raising $4 billion in a new funding round.

This Series L round would value the company at $134 billion, up 34% from its last session of funding during the summer, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported Tuesday (Dec. 16).

Ali Ghodsi, Databricks’ co-founder and CEO, told the WSJ the company plans to use the new funding to invest in its core data-analytics products and AI software, while also letting its workers engage in secondary share sales.

The company, among the most valuable private firms in Silicon Valley, also plans to hire around 600 fresh college graduates in 2026, the CEO added, in addition to adding thousands of new jobs worldwide in Asia, Latin America and Europe. It also plans to hire AI researchers, who are typically paid top salaries, the WSJ added.

The report noted that Databricks has benefited from the AI boom, which relies partially on private corporate data to customize AI models. Databricks told the WSJ that its data-warehousing product, which can serve as an underlying data platform for AI services, surpassed a $1 billion revenue run rate at the end of October.

This year has seen Databricks ink deals with OpenAI and Anthropic to help sell AI services to business customers. Each of these partnerships are designed to push clients to develop AI agents, or independent bots that can carry out tasks on behalf of humans.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

The company’s new funding round comes three months after Databricks’ Series K round, which valued it more than $100 billion, up from $62 billion at the start of the year.

In other AI news, PYMNTS wrote earlier this week about The General Intelligence Company of New York, a start up developing agent-based systems designed to take over large portions of company operations.

“The company’s name deliberately evokes Gilded Age ambition, and founder Andrew Pignanelli told PYMNTS that the reference was intentional,” that report said. “He said he views AI as foundational infrastructure for the next era of company-building, much as railroads and industrial capital reshaped the United States economy more than a century ago.”

The company started by working backward from “the one-person billion-dollar business,” as Pignanelli termed it.

“We started at the end, the actual one-person billion-dollar company, and worked our way back and we were like, ‘What can we do today?’” he said.

Continue Reading

Fintech

Apple App Store Fees Face Pressure From EU Developers | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

A collection of app developers and consumer groups want Europe to enforce laws against Apple.

The Coalition of App Fairness (CAF) on Monday (Dec. 15) issued an open letter to the European Commission (EC) accusing the tech giant of “persistent” non-compliance with Europe’s Digital Markets Act (DMA).

The letter follows findings from the EC that Apple had violated the DMA by keeping developers from directing users to alternative payment methods, fining the tech giant $588 million.

Apple in turn revised its terms for its app store to impose fees that ranged from from 13% for smaller businesses to up to 20% for App Store purchases. However, the CAF says Apple has not addressed what it calls a core issue: the company’s fees are preventing fair competition.

“The law says that gatekeepers like Apple must allow developers to offer and conduct transactions outside of the App Store free of charge,” the letter said. “However, Apple is now charging developers commission, fees of up to 20% for such transactions. This is a blatant disregard for the law with the potential to vanquish years of meaningful work by the Commission.”

The CAF also notes that Apple plans to introduce new terms and conditions for the App Store next month, and says it suspects the new terms will include fees that violate the DMA.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

“Apple cannot be permitted to exploit its gatekeeper position by holding the entire industry hostage,” the letter added.

PYMNTS has contacted Apple for comment but has not yet gotten a reply. The company had in September called on the commission to rethink the DMA, which was created to prevent market abuse by tech giants doing business in Europe.

“Over that time, it’s become clear that the DMA is leading to a worse experience for Apple users in the EU,” Apple wrote in a blog post. “It’s exposing them to new risks, and disrupting the simple, seamless way their Apple products work together. And as new technologies come out, our European users’ Apple products will only fall further behind.”

In its blog post, Apple argued the DMA requirements for allowing other app marketplaces and alternative payment systems don’t take into account the privacy and security standards of the App Store, putting customers at risk for being overcharged or scammed.

“The DMA also lets other companies request access to user data and core technologies of Apple products,” the company wrote. “Apple is required to meet almost every request, even if they create serious risks for our users.”

Continue Reading

Trending