Connect with us

Fintech

OCC Letters Reframe Crypto as Standard Banking Activity | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

U.S. banking regulators are warming up to cryptocurrency in a way never seen before.

For much of the digital asset sector’s history, crypto companies have accused U.S. regulators of regulatory arbitrage by enforcement, while regulators accused the industry of racing ahead of basic risk controls. Banks, caught in the middle, largely stayed on the sidelines, experimenting quietly while waiting for a clearer signal.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has spent much of 2025 repeatedly flashing that clearer signal to banks, with the latest green light coming Tuesday (Dec. 9) with the news that banks can engage in permissible activities related to riskless principal transactions in crypto assets, aka brokering cryptocurrency assets for customers.

Over the course of the year, the OCC has issued no fewer than four crypto-specific interpretive letters, as well as additional crypto-adjacent letters, affirming the authority of national banks to engage in a widening set of digital asset activities. These include activities pertaining custody of cryptocurrency assets, participation in distributed ledger networks, settlement activities, and now brokering crypto assets on behalf of customers.

At the same time, Comptroller J. Gould on Monday (Dec. 8) publicly emphasized his desire to “invigorate the chartering of new banks,” a remark that lands squarely in the context of fintech, crypto-native institutions, and the long-dormant promise of special-purpose charters.

Taken together, these moves do not amount to a wholesale embrace of cryptocurrency. The OCC remains careful, conditional, and explicit about safety and soundness. But they do represent something more significant: a coherent point of view that cryptocurrency, while risky and uneven, is no longer categorically outside the perimeter of mainstream banking.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

Read more: OCC Says Banks Can Hold Crypto, but Should They? 

What This Means for Mainstream Finance

It is important to note that interpretive letters are not rulemakings. They do not create new law, nor do they bind other regulators. But within the OCC’s ecosystem, they matter. They clarify how the agency reads existing statutes and regulations, and they shape how examiners approach real-world activities.

PYMNTS reported in July that the confirmation of Jonathan Gould as comptroller of the currency signaled a relaxation of digital asset regulations, particularly for banks, and an easier path for some nonbanks and digital upstarts to obtain banking charters.

Gould has previously been chief legal officer at blockchain firm Bitfury and, before that, served as senior deputy comptroller and chief counsel at the OCC during the first Trump administration.

This year’s worth of OCC letters follow a consistent structure. Each begins by reaffirming that national banks may engage in activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking, provided those activities are conducted in a safe and sound manner and comply with applicable laws. Crypto, the OCC essentially says, is not a category unto itself; it is a set of technologies and assets that can fall within existing banking authorities.

Earlier letters addressed custody of crypto assets, including holding private keys on behalf of customers. That alone marked a meaningful shift from the era when banks worried that custody implied endorsement or balance-sheet exposure. The OCC’s view was narrower: custody is a service, not a bet, and banks already hold valuable assets for customers every day.

See also: Building the Blockchain Blueprint: How Leading FIs Are Modernizing Money, Markets and Trust 

Subsequent guidance extended that logic to participation in distributed ledger networks for payments and settlement, including the use of stablecoins to facilitate transactions. Again, the framing mattered. The OCC was not blessing any particular token or blockchain. It was stating that if a digital representation of value functions as a payment mechanism, banks can interact with it — subject to controls.

The most recent letter, authorizing banks to broker crypto assets for customers, completes the arc. Brokerage is not custody. It implies execution, market access, disclosures and customer-facing risk management. In effect, the OCC is acknowledging that crypto markets are no longer niche venues but trading environments that customers expect their financial institutions to help them navigate.

This insistence on normalization cuts both ways. For banks, it lowers the conceptual barrier to entry. Cryptocurrency is just another asset class, another infrastructure layer, another service offering. For crypto-native firms hoping for lighter treatment, it is a sobering message: access to the banking system comes with banking-grade obligations.

The next, and perhaps most pressing, question is what businesses will do in this fresh landscape.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fintech

Speed Raises $8 Million to Expand Bitcoin and Stablecoin Payment Solutions | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

The company will use the new funding to build capacity, expand to new regions, develop more merchant tools, enable cross-border and creator payouts, and maintain reliability and compliance, it said in a Tuesday (Dec. 16) blog post.

Speed’s offerings include a global payment layer called Speed Merchant that is designed for merchants, platforms and payment systems and enables them to accept both Bitcoin and stablecoins, according to the post.

The company also offers a Lightning wallet called Speed Wallet that serves individuals and businesses and enables Bitcoin and stablecoin transfers, supports global payouts, offers local on- and off-ramps, and powers USDT transactions, the post said.

“We’ve always believed that Bitcoin and stablecoins can power everyday payments,” Speed CEO Niraj Patel said in the post. “That requires real infrastructure—fast, compliant and scalable. This investment validates that belief and accelerates our mission.”

Speed co-founder Jayneel Patel said in the post that the company aims to “solve real problems with technology.”

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

“Speed started as a merchant solution and has grown into a global payment network,” Jayneel Patel said, adding the company is “ready to take the next leap.”

Stablecoin issuer Tether and venture fund ego death capital co-led the funding round, per the post.

Tether said in a Tuesday press release that its investment supports its strategy to support Bitcoin-aligned financial infrastructure and expand the utility of its USDT stablecoin in real-world payment environments.

“We support teams building practical infrastructure that reduces friction in payments and expands access to reliable settlement rails,” Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said in the release.

Tether’s USDT stablecoin is the most traded cryptocurrency by volume around the world.

Adam Gebner, associate at ego death capital, said in a Tuesday blog post that Speed processed over $1.5 billion in payment volume over the past 12 months and serves more than 1.2 million users.

“By bridging Lightning and stablecoins in a single, compliant platform, Speed is positioning itself as foundational infrastructure for the Bitcoin and stablecoin economy, serving merchants, platforms and users across both developed and emerging markets,” Gebner said in the post.

Continue Reading

Fintech

Databricks Targets $134 Billion Valuation in New Funding Round | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Data analytics/artificial intelligence (AI) firm Databricks is reportedly raising $4 billion in a new funding round.

This Series L round would value the company at $134 billion, up 34% from its last session of funding during the summer, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported Tuesday (Dec. 16).

Ali Ghodsi, Databricks’ co-founder and CEO, told the WSJ the company plans to use the new funding to invest in its core data-analytics products and AI software, while also letting its workers engage in secondary share sales.

The company, among the most valuable private firms in Silicon Valley, also plans to hire around 600 fresh college graduates in 2026, the CEO added, in addition to adding thousands of new jobs worldwide in Asia, Latin America and Europe. It also plans to hire AI researchers, who are typically paid top salaries, the WSJ added.

The report noted that Databricks has benefited from the AI boom, which relies partially on private corporate data to customize AI models. Databricks told the WSJ that its data-warehousing product, which can serve as an underlying data platform for AI services, surpassed a $1 billion revenue run rate at the end of October.

This year has seen Databricks ink deals with OpenAI and Anthropic to help sell AI services to business customers. Each of these partnerships are designed to push clients to develop AI agents, or independent bots that can carry out tasks on behalf of humans.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

The company’s new funding round comes three months after Databricks’ Series K round, which valued it more than $100 billion, up from $62 billion at the start of the year.

In other AI news, PYMNTS wrote earlier this week about The General Intelligence Company of New York, a start up developing agent-based systems designed to take over large portions of company operations.

“The company’s name deliberately evokes Gilded Age ambition, and founder Andrew Pignanelli told PYMNTS that the reference was intentional,” that report said. “He said he views AI as foundational infrastructure for the next era of company-building, much as railroads and industrial capital reshaped the United States economy more than a century ago.”

The company started by working backward from “the one-person billion-dollar business,” as Pignanelli termed it.

“We started at the end, the actual one-person billion-dollar company, and worked our way back and we were like, ‘What can we do today?’” he said.

Continue Reading

Fintech

Apple App Store Fees Face Pressure From EU Developers | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

A collection of app developers and consumer groups want Europe to enforce laws against Apple.

The Coalition of App Fairness (CAF) on Monday (Dec. 15) issued an open letter to the European Commission (EC) accusing the tech giant of “persistent” non-compliance with Europe’s Digital Markets Act (DMA).

The letter follows findings from the EC that Apple had violated the DMA by keeping developers from directing users to alternative payment methods, fining the tech giant $588 million.

Apple in turn revised its terms for its app store to impose fees that ranged from from 13% for smaller businesses to up to 20% for App Store purchases. However, the CAF says Apple has not addressed what it calls a core issue: the company’s fees are preventing fair competition.

“The law says that gatekeepers like Apple must allow developers to offer and conduct transactions outside of the App Store free of charge,” the letter said. “However, Apple is now charging developers commission, fees of up to 20% for such transactions. This is a blatant disregard for the law with the potential to vanquish years of meaningful work by the Commission.”

The CAF also notes that Apple plans to introduce new terms and conditions for the App Store next month, and says it suspects the new terms will include fees that violate the DMA.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

“Apple cannot be permitted to exploit its gatekeeper position by holding the entire industry hostage,” the letter added.

PYMNTS has contacted Apple for comment but has not yet gotten a reply. The company had in September called on the commission to rethink the DMA, which was created to prevent market abuse by tech giants doing business in Europe.

“Over that time, it’s become clear that the DMA is leading to a worse experience for Apple users in the EU,” Apple wrote in a blog post. “It’s exposing them to new risks, and disrupting the simple, seamless way their Apple products work together. And as new technologies come out, our European users’ Apple products will only fall further behind.”

In its blog post, Apple argued the DMA requirements for allowing other app marketplaces and alternative payment systems don’t take into account the privacy and security standards of the App Store, putting customers at risk for being overcharged or scammed.

“The DMA also lets other companies request access to user data and core technologies of Apple products,” the company wrote. “Apple is required to meet almost every request, even if they create serious risks for our users.”

Continue Reading

Trending